Linguistics

interférence - emprunt - « code-mixing » - « codeswitching » - stratégie communicative. Abstract: Algeria like the Maghreb countries shows a varied and complex configuration of its sociolinguistic heritage which articulates around social as well as linguistic dimensions. In fact, the Algerian speaks uses multifaceted language resulting from the combination of several languages. Keywords: Multilingual - interference - borrowed words - code-mixing - code-switching, communicative strategy. ‫اﻟﻤﻠﺨﺺ:

product formating » in a profession that used to be mostly concerned with style ». Selon ce chercheur, les changements qui affectent aujourd’hui la profession « point to increasing demands on a cognitive faculty that is only marginally present in linguistic or even more generally language-based models, i.e. the adaptive faculty » (Simeoni 1998 : 31). Dans la même veine, Defeng Li (2000) mentionne la nécessité de développer les aptitudes des étudiants à travailler en groupe. Tandis que se redéfinissent

which leans on the surrealist thought. A linear study of this text appears me justified to examine Breton's argumentation. Then, from this extract, I will examine in which measures and how Breton and the Surrealist movement radically questioned the linguistic. Finally, I shall take into consideration that certain criticisms call the surrealist and its principles into question. From the beginning, the author honors the imagination, by trying to show that it is necessary to liberate the imagination

from overall language proficiency (Diagram 2), but into “Communicative language competences”. Three main constituents of Communicative language competences are distinguished: linguistic, Sociolinguistic and Pragmatic. The linguistic competences are important in achieving efficiency and effectiveness in language use. For linguistic competence two factors are distinguished: range and control and within each of these two factors several aspects are distinguished. For each box in the diagram descriptive

JETS 47/4 (December 2004) 629-45 BIBLICAL METAPHORS AND THE DOCTRINE OF THE ATONEMENT HENRI BLOCHER* Metaphors have been a topic en vogue for several decades. Factors include the so-called "linguistic turn'' of Western thought—Michel Meyer, who teaches at the University of Brussels, suggests "one could speak of a 'rhetoric turn' with Habermas and Perelman, Eco and Gadamer"1—the emphasis on the social sciences, on anthropology, and on the power symbolic systems have to mold minds and behavior;

complex cases as easily as we do is a testimony to just how nuanced our powers of pragmatic interpretation are. Perhaps the most important lesson to be drawn from our discussion, however, is that we need to attend to the specific behavior of the linguistic phenomena we are investigating. Language can be poetic – in the sense of inducing evocative, open-ended, holistic, imagistic, and/or affective perspectives – in a variety of ways. Just because metaphor does this doesn’t mean that it can’t also accomplish

telle compétence. En 1978, Leslie Cameron-Bandler publie la première articulation de tous les aspects verbaux et non verbaux de ses systèmes de représentation[51]. Une autre synthèse est publiée par Dilts, Grinder, Bandler et Delozier dans Neuro-Linguistic Programming - NLP Volume I en 1980[48]. En 1977, Grinder quitte l'université[35]. Dès lors, les praticiens explorent d'autres disciplines, en conservant les postulats de la Programmation Neuro-Linguistique. Ils développent des applications ou des

The purpose of this article is to shed new light on the intellectual and theoretical context in which a major concept in linguistics was created. This concept, termed polysémie by the assyriologist J. Halévy in the 1870s, is one of the first concepts defined in the emerging “science of meaning” elaborated by M. Bréal, the author who introduced the term sémantique into linguistics. Although Bréal did not invent the concept of polysemy, he contributed to its diffusion through the success of his Essai

Development Program (BPIDP). Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Léon, Pierre R., 1926Structure du français moderne : introduction à l’analyse linguistique / Pierre Léon, Parth Bhatt. -- 3rd rev. ed. ISBN 1-55130-242-X 1. Linguistic analysis (Linguistics). 2. French language--Textbooks for second language learners. I. Bhatt, Parth Markand, 1955- II. Title. PC2128.L46 2005 440 C2004-905715-4 Cover design by Zack Taylor, www.zacktaylor.com Text design and layout by Brad Horning

l’éducation. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. Numéro spécial sur les  droits à l’éducation des minorités nationales, 4.2. http://www.osce.org/hcnm/.    Hale, Ken  1998   On  endangered  languages  and  the  importance  of  linguistic  diversity.  In  Endangered Languages; Language Loss and Community Response, ed. De Lenore A.  Grenoble et Lindsay J. Whaley, p. 192‐216, Cambridge, Cambridge University  Press.    Krauss, Michael  2000 Preliminary  Suggestions  for  Classification