Neoclassical economics

evolution and economic theory [Incertitude, évolution et théorie économique], Journal of Political Economy, Vol 58, n°3, pp211-221 o Repris en 1986, In: J. B. Barney et W. G. Ouchi, dir., Organizational Economics, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, and London, pp305-19 o Repris en 2001, In: James M. Buchanan, dir., Landmark Papers in Economics, Politics and Law, Cheltenham, Elgar • 1953, o a. The Meaning of Utility Measurement, American Economic Review, Vol

Private Capital ?», Journal of Monetary Economics, 24 (7), 1989, PP.171-188. ASCHAUER D.A. (1989) «Is Public Expenditure Productive ?», Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, 1989, PP.177-200. Banque Mondiale (2002) «Qualité de la croissance», De Boeck Université, Bruxelles, 2002, 282P. BARRO R. (1990) «Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth», Journal of Political Economy, Vol.98, N°5, Octobre 1990, PP.103-125. BARRO R. (1991) « Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries »

necessary conditions, transaction cost problems and choice of exchange structure», Strategic Management Journal, 271-290 Conner, K. (1991), «A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics : do we have a new theory of the firm ?», Journal of Management, vol. 17, 121-154 Dierickx, I. et K. Cool (1989), «Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage», Management Science, vol. 35, 1504-1511 Earl, M. (1996), «The

to that condition. In the final three chapters of the book, therefore, we descend from some of the lofty heights of IR theory explored in the first ten chapters, and consider the centrality of the state from three angles, state-making, states, and economic globalization, and the role of the state in contemporary normative IR theory. A central theme that emerges from these three chapters is the increasing ‘disaggregation’ of the state form in IR (Sørensen 2004), and how that transformation exacerbates

are displaced by monies with inferior properties […] The observation that bad money drives out good money, usually called Gresham’s law, has become one of the more famous maxims in economics and has been used to account for many episodes of monetary disorder. This Economic Commentary examines the history and the economic foundations of Gresham’s law and identifies two explanations for the law. The first relies on government intervention in currency exchange rates. The second relies on the presence

management. of business and which challenged the neoclassical or liberal view of "stockholder supremacy" economics. This traditional view of business holds that the purpose of business is to maximize the interests of shareholders. Stakeholder theory therefore presents itself as an attempt to found a new theory of the firm integrating its environment with which it maintains relations and acts, in order to go beyond the classic shareholder and economic vision of the firm, which maximizes profit. It

macroeconomics as it stands today, i.e. stochastic dynamic Walrasian models. Our paper ends with a brief evocation of the recent contestation of real business cycle models of the first generation. Keywords: Macroeconomic Models, Neoclassical Synthesis, New Classical Economics JEL Classification: B2, E1 ✶ Cette étude a paru dans la collection des publications des économistes de Louvain, Regards économiques, juin 2005, n° 30. Nous remercions Vincent Bodard pour ses remarques sur une version antérieure

International Economics : A Selfteaching Introduction to the Basic Concepts. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 2nd edition, 1979. 2- AKIRA Takayama (1972), International Trade: An Approach to the Theory. Holt. Rinehardt and Winston, Inc., New York. 3- BARRET, S., 1994, Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade, Journal of Public Economics 54, 325-338. 4- BRANDER, J.A., P.R. KRUGMAN, 1983, A Reciprocal Dumping Model on International Trade, Journal of International Economics 15, 313-321. 5-

nation-state? Is globality different from modernity? Is a global culture in the making? Guillén closes with some thoughts on what one of the fields covered in this book – sociology (others include political science, international relations, anthropology, economics, literary theory, geography) – has contributed to our understanding of globalization, as well as on the need for further research and more interdisciplinary work on the topic. Several of the debates outlined by Guillén appear later in this book,

Glorious 30 are synonymous with fairly steady growth in production, mass consumption relatively standardized and real wages, the ‘70s were marked by a breakdown of these developments on several levels, namely: - A fluctuate production with changes in economic conditions, - Increased competition (globalization) that requires more productivity gains, - Rapid obsolescence of certain property (technical progress) - More frequent changes in consumer tastes (shorter production series). Given this environment