Globalization

donc les mesures de la pauvreté, des inégalités et de la mondialisation, et enfin les difficultés méthodologiques liées aux méthodes de modélisation en équilibre général. Abstract : Globalization and Poverty : Fragileness of Computable General Equilibrium Models In the debate between “pro” and “anti” globalization one of the main questions deals with the effects of trade liberalization on developing countries, and especially on poverty. The argumentation on this point is very controversial since

the internationalizing of the state as “the global process whereby national policies and practices have been adjusted to the exigencies of the world economy of international production”[1]. This notion is de facto closely linked to the notion of globalization that R. Cox explained as the “growing connectedness and interdependence on a world scale. It is multidimensional: connectedness in politics and the organization of security, in economics and welfare, in culture, in ecology, in values of all kinds”[2]

s'entraider pour rivaliser à cette forte croissance de ces pays asiatiques pour pouvoir espérer sortir de cette crise et pérenniser leur avenir économique. The reluctance of European countries deal with globalization is primarily due to the fact that there was an interdependence of economies, as globalization through exchanges with other countries around the world have greatly increased but also thanks to the interdependence savings in financial market. Financial market securities and shares are traded

them. We can take the case of the Magna Carta in 1215 which establishes the Habeas Corpus which prevents, among others, the arbitrary detention. In a second part, I think that learning Common law today in France, is interesting because of the globalization. Indeed, the compared-law is in progress. In an international world you have to know the right of the other countries and moreover rights of close countries. If an English citizen and a French citizen are in a conflict, which law applied; French

level,   culture   can   be   properly   protected.       Heated   conflicts   over   trade   and   culture   are   reaching   fever   pitch   in   the   globalization   era.   It   is   true   that   globalization   permits   diffusion   of   diversity,   thanks   to   exchanges   and   communications’   development.   However,   it   also   threatens   diversity,   when

international : Many countries have qualms about globalization. From Latin America to East Asia, voices are raised against widening inequalities, the lack of democratic accountability, and cultural homogenization, Seattle revealed that even in the United States, numerous groups oppose opening borders to trade and investment. But France has taken the International lead here because its political and cultural identity combines all the elements threatened by globalization: a universalistic culture, a language

has produced it’s own “Big Mac index”. This index gives a guide to the purchasing power of different currencies buying a standardized product available from McDonald’s around the world. Like Coca Cola, this multinational has become a symbol of globalization and of the influence of American way of life and this is also why it has been so criticized these last years. Since the 1990s McDonald’s have to face to several controversies. II. Happy Meal? With this huge success, the multinational has been

Marshall McLuhan, et surtout par le biais des mouvements antimondialistes et altermondialistes, qui attirent, par leur dénomination même, l'attention du public sur l'ampleur du phénomène. Dans le monde anglophone, la popularisation du terme globalization et son usage comme terme fourre-tout a accentué le débat académique. Il est maintenant admis que le terme désigne le développement de l'interdépendance au niveau mondial. À partir de cette définition générale chaque grand courant académique met

FINANCIAL CRISIS LECTURE I (12/10) Why Learn Asian Crisis? In an Increasingly Globalized World, Everything Is Connected… Globalization in simple terms is: What’s happening in one part of the world affects your country and your individual life. Let’s see what kind of examples are there in our everyday life:  Security threat (terrorism, organized crime, smuggling, piracy, etc.) is getting more international, owing to developments in communications, transport, and financial technologies

business practices. For example, Nestlé policies have relevant International Labour Organisation Conventions, and the International (WHO) Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. Two factors underlie the trend toward the increasing globalization of markets and of production. The first is the declining of barriers to enable the free flow of goods, services, and capital. The second factors are the dramatic changes in communication, information, and transportation technologies. Companies