Évènes

prominent role of imagination, showing how the three are similar. Indeed he pronounces this last word not less than three times in his response to his wife to be, Hippolyta. What do these three categories of people have in common? Are they idealistic, even naive, or victims of their imagination? Why should we put side-by-side lunatics – in other words madmen – and lovers, and not include the poets? Surely because poets are often considered naturally and unsurprisingly irrational and imaginative in order

to- along While- as Then Right ! welle ! so ! then ! Yet- however Though Even so-all the same In-to-among Anyway- then- although- while After By-from-with-to-of Already- ever -yet Over-on top- over In-into-to-at-of Still-yet-even-again-over Though Approximately- some-so-about-around- round And then- so Up to-until- over Thus far-up to now- till then- till now Then- that time But- yet- only Yet Even-yet anyway Néanmoins Yet- however 2 Par By-through Par tout All over-over

written by Lorrie Moore in 1990 and “The Best Grilfriend You Never Had” written by Pam Houston in 1999. What is interesting with these two stories is that they have been written at the same period (they involve people belonging to the same generation even if nine years distance them) and treat of the same subject: Who am I? Where do I go? The women who are protagonists of the two short stories are really different, but their lives strangely match each other ones. They both are in their early thirties

United States. It is obviously Barack Obama who has taken the lead. He believes that even when the national interest is at stake, they should intervene, even if it is only for moral issues. Last Saturday, the action began and lasted about fifteen hours. For the president, it is an action mandated by the UN, humanitarian, and in support of an international coalition. Obama described this action as an example; he even said that this is the way the world should work. It's a strong message from him, because

to introduce the narrator and “the scene for the story [he is] about to tell”, not its main character. Indeed, as we could expect from the title, we immediately discover the setting, Brooklyn, even before knowing anything about the narrator. However, we learn quite a lot about the man who is talking, even if we don’t understand immediately what he means when he tells about his death (since he only alludes to his cancer as if by chance). Moreover, we don’t know his name yet: his way of introducing

There are 3 characters in this extract: Billy (the son), his father, and his “nan.” The main issue raised in this document, is whether ballet is suitable for boys or not. This matter is addressed in a passive way on the way back home, because even though none said a word, tension was very present between the two men, and in a confrontational way once they arrive home. None of them greet the grandmother, as they both felt stressed. The reader can guess that the characters involved in this extract

can't get for nothing. Oscar Wilde There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark." Pink Floyd ♥ you Can Only See What I Choose To Show. -Truth is still absolute. Believe that. Even when that truth is hard and cold, and more painful than you've ever imagined, even when truth is more cruel than any lie. -Dnt judge me based on ur ignorance. On apprend de ses échecs, pas de ses victoires! Waiting for My Rocket to Come Jason mraz If you are not too long, I will wait

Japan’s economy became highly regulated being an economy closed to foreign markets with high quotas, restrictions and so on but the strong power of its competitors like the USA and the EU forced Japan to open its market to the foreign competition. Even if it was difficult for the country, Japan managed to develop a technologically advanced economy thanks to the cooperation of the government and the industry. Nevertheless, in 1997, the financial crisis which affected the Asia was a factor of the economic

them furious”. Even Demetrio, the leader of the revolutionaries, starts the revolution not to fight for any strong ideals or some earnest course. He recounts to Luis Cervantes how he daringly spits on an official’s beard and has to abandon his town and become a rebel to avoid arrest. Conclusively, none of the revolutionaries fought for any concrete ideals. Yes, they each had personal reasons for joining the revolution, some to enrich themselves and most to escape the law. It is even interesting to

called ‘American Democracy’. Thus, Khan offers the readers an introspective vision at the heart of a fortress where no law nor right pervade, and where innumerable breaches to Human Rights end up ‘Classified’. By such testimonies, she demonstrates that even the most powerful country in this world can return to processes we thought were totally revoked in democratic states. She denounces an almost systematic imprisonment of people for whom there is no evidence suggesting that they are Taliban or Al-Qaeda